Skip to content
WOW FOREVERBuilds • Guides

WoW Forever News · names · beta · blizzard

'I read the list. No sympathy': the WoW Forever name filter was not ready for two-part names

Senior game producer Tom Ellis has explained why so many offensive names slipped into the WoW Forever beta: the naming filter was not ready for the two-part system, and Blizzard assumed players would behave for a few weeks. Instead the team ran every name through the filter manually. After the ban wave, developers re-read every removed name and checked the complaints posted on Reddit and X, finding that each complainant had left out a fourth character.

By the WoW Forever Builds News Desk ·

A magistrate striking a name from a long registry while a ghostly nameplate above an adventurer dissolves

Yesterday Blizzard confirmed the forced renames and beta removals. Today we know why it was needed at all, because the producer who read the list decided to answer the complaints in public.

The filter was not ready

Senior game producer Tom Ellis gave the root cause on X. The naming filter, he said, was not ready for dual names, and the team assumed that after twenty years players knew where the line was, so the beta would be fine for a few weeks until the filter came online.

That is the whole story in one sentence. WoW’s live filter is strict and catches most variations of an offensive name, but the two-part system is new, and the version that understands it was unfinished when the beta opened on September 17.

It did not survive day one. By Ellis’s account the team ended up running every name through the filter by hand, then double checking the results.

What happened to the complaints

After the ban wave went out alongside the first patch, players took to Reddit and X saying they had been punished for a mildly rude joke. Ellis says a couple of developers spent the evening re-reading the list and going through those posts one by one. The pattern they found: everyone showing off three cheeky names had a fourth character they left out of the screenshot.

He also drew the line between the two actions, which matters if you were hit by one of them. Someone claiming they lost beta access over a pun like Billy Mcsuckmahballz, he says, is telling a white lie: that character most likely just got a forced rename.

Then the part that spread furthest:

I read the list. No sympathy. Be a better human next time.

His reminder to anyone still protesting is that Blizzard can see every character on the account, not only the one being played.

There is no new rule

The most useful clarification for anyone planning a name for launch: nothing about the policy changed for Forever. Ellis says the removed names would have been banned in any version of WoW at any point in its history, and would have earned a suspension there too.

What changed is the opportunity. A second name doubles the space to hide something in, and the filter that reads both halves together is only coming online now.

What this means for launch

  • The filter is catching up. Blizzard said its enforcement system comes online shortly, and asked testers not to probe it.
  • Forced rename and beta removal are different. A crude pun gets a rename. The removals were for the extreme end, reviewed by people rather than a script.
  • Every character on your account is visible. An alt made as a joke counts.
  • Early name reservation opens October 27. A name that trips the filter wastes the slot. Our naming guide covers how the two-part system works.

The wider point, as PC Gamer put it, is that Forever’s whole pitch rests on strangers grouping up with strangers. That only works if the name above someone’s head is not the reason you would rather play alone.

Sources

How this article was made: drafted with AI from the sources listed above, then checked and edited by the WoW Forever Builds team before publishing. WoW Forever Builds is a fan site and not affiliated with Blizzard Entertainment.

More WoW Forever news

All news →